Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mt-daapd - An iTunes-compatible media server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248277 ------- Additional Comments From jeff@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-12-19 13:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #16) > > In reference to comment #14, I received a reply from the author and he > > recommended using the avahi code as well. I have three questions: > > > > 1. Is it legally okay to ship an SRPM with license issues (a la > > GPLv2 + Apache) if the corresponding code is disabled at compile > > time? > > I don't have a reference handy, but I think that the answer is no. Actually after thinking about this some more, I think that the answer may be yes. Since the Apple license is free enough to qualify for Fedora, we can ship the code. What's prohibited is combining the Apple licensed code with GPL licensed code. Since we can do that by choosing our configure options properly I think that we're ok. The Asterisk situation was different in that some of the code in Asterisk had a license that prohibited Fedora from shipping it. It'd still be good to ping Tom Callaway about this since he deals with this stuff more often. It'd be even better for upstream to get the licensing figured out properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review