Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mt-daapd - An iTunes-compatible media server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248277 ------- Additional Comments From mike@xxxxxxxx 2007-12-19 12:40 EST ------- In reference to comment #14, I received a reply from the author and he recommended using the avahi code as well. I have three questions: 1. Is it legally okay to ship an SRPM with license issues (a la GPLv2 + Apache) if the corresponding code is disabled at compile time? 2. If the answer to 1 is no, then is it okay to ship an SRPM with license issues if the correspoinding code is removed with a patch by the build process? 3. If the answer to 1 and 2 is no, then would we need to fork mt-daapd to get it into Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review