https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2139183 --- Comment #3 from Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #2) > I'd be more then happy if this replaced the coffee-script package (and me > not being maintainer of CoffeeScript). Unfortunately, there is > rubygem-coffee-script-source which still depends on coffee-script 1.x and in > turn, there is the following dependency tree: Good point, I should probably prep patches for those as well in a COPR before I land this in F38. ... > And several notes about the .spec (although I don't think I am the right > person to review): > > 1) Why is the dependency direction between coffeescript and js-coffeescript > packages reversed? I believe that the main package is superset to the js- > subpackage. Mostly it just required less post-processing in %install, but I can put it back the other direction if preferred. > 2) Does `%autosetup` support `-a 2` option to replace the `tar xf %{SOURCE2}` Thanks, I was unaware of that option. I'll change it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2139183 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
