https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2134972 --- Comment #11 from Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Jeremy Linton from comment #10) > Ha, I turned it into noarch because fedora-review was complaining it didn't > produce any binaries. Its easy to change it back to just x86 and arm. > We do have %efi for arches. I used it for rEFInd: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rEFInd/blob/rawhide/f/rEFInd.spec#_49-51 Since you don't produce any binaries, you probably want to disable debuginfo packages so it doesn't complain. > But, to your second point, yeah I think that when/if that happens, it's a > reasonable expectation that these little bits get merged into it. > > As part of this process, It will be worthwhile to revisit systemd after my > patch lands upstream, to post a PR extracting systemd-boot from systemd-udev. This should probably happen before this package lands. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2134972 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
