Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sgml-common https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226415 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx 2007-12-19 09:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #15) > > Anyway looks good now, except that the xml-common url doesn't > > correspond at all with the xml-common package. This url, however > > links to some explanations, and ultimately to files in > > http://www.w3.org/2003/entities/2007/ > > Actually I think there is no free completely corresponding url for sgml-common > and xml-common. Old swiss page with iso 8879 was not 100% correct too, because > in sgml-common and xml-common is only subset of full set of entities. Anyway - I > think the best way is to keep it as it is done now - with link to w3.org entities. For sgml-common, sure, but for xml-common, I think that the best is not to provide any URL, since there is no url corresponding with that package. It will inherit the sgml-common url fine in any case. > > Sone of these files are in docbook-dtds. I don't know about others. > > Should they be shipped somehow? > > Which files do you mean? I agree that docbook-dtds corresponds somehow with > sgml-common/xml-common entities - as both are subsets docbook entities. All the .ent files at: http://www.w3.org/2003/entities/2007/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review