https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129303 --- Comment #14 from Sergey <sergey@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Benson Muite from comment #13) > Thanks. Scons packaging guidelines are still to be done: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/DraftsTodo > so your efforts have really helped with this. Godot and gpsd have Scons in > BuildRequires: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gpsd/blob/rawhide/f/gpsd.spec > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/godot/blob/rawhide/f/godot.spec Actually there are 24 packages that BR Scons (less than 0.1%) in Fedora ATM. > but they do not have further use for the Scons build and configuration files > which seems to > be an approach specific to this package used because Scons is very > configurable. Yes, the upstream developer controls both the `cbang` and most (if not all) dependant projects, so he reuses as much of his work as suitable. > > Arch also has Cbang: > https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=cbang > > and packages entire config directory. > > It is unclear how to manage the .pyc files. You have used the > %py_byte_compile macro as described in the documentation: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python_201x/ > #_byte_compiling > Should a different path than you have chosen be used? For example > /usr/libexec/cbang/config or /usr/share/cbang/config > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_libexecdir > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2015-April/010611.html I have no objections to move these files. Though, the `%{_libexecdir}` is more suitable than `%{_datadir}` as `config` contains `executable programs that are designed primarily to be run by other programs rather than by users`. I'll do this. Thank you, Sergey -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129303 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
