https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129303 --- Comment #4 from Sergey <sergey@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Sergey from comment #2) > > e) Maybe worth asking upstream to soname the library? > > I have asked Joseph on his versioning policy in general and he replied that > he has no one [0]. As 1) Joseph adds the functionality on as needed basis, > 2) there > are obvious bugfixes, 3) camotics builds properly with up-to-date version of > cbang > and 4) cbang exports c++ classes, I decided to use `version.subversion` as > an so version, > leaving `.revision` for bug fixes in cbang. The leading zero in `libcbang0` > is from > upstream, I suspect that it is somehow related to debian packaging/naming, > so I > leaved this as is. However, I will ask Joseph again about soname > specifically. Done, confirmed upstream https://github.com/CauldronDevelopmentLLC/cbang/issues/103 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129303 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
