https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051643 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Kadlčík <jkadlcik@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Thank you for the changes, > Issues: > ======= > - Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided > in the spec URL. > Note: Upstream MD5sum check error, diff is in > /home/jkadlcik/2051643-lite-xl/diff.txt > See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/SourceURL/ Unfortunately, the fedora-review tool still complains about the MD5sum check error. The following things are minor and I won't block the review because of them but please consider ... > So I added a patch file. > I will contact upstream. Once you file an upstream issue or a PR, can you please link it in the spec file? So we can track when the downstream patch is no longer necessary. > Summary: A lightweight text editor written in Lua, adapted from lite. Summary shouldn't end with a period, rpmlint complains about it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051643 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
