https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132289 --- Comment #4 from Robin Lee <robinlee.sysu@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Benson Muite from comment #3) > Thanks for the change. If versioning cannot be done upstream, can it be > versioned for Fedora? See > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ > #_downstream_so_name_versioning I don't think that's necessary. The library can be considered private to Deepin DE. There is already some other DDE package, like deepin-control-center, that provides unversioned so. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132289 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
