https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120450 Mikel Olasagasti Uranga <mikel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |mikel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mikel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #2 from Mikel Olasagasti Uranga <mikel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Spec is correct, but I've one doubt. Diff between v3 and v4 has not any relevant change over previous version: https://github.com/twpayne/go-vfs/compare/v3.0.0...v4.1.0 I've checked if xdg-v6 package could work with go-vfs-v4 and, as expected, works fine. https://github.com/twpayne/go-xdg/pull/7 I see three options: a) Package go-vfs-v3 as-is in this BZ b) Package go-vfs-v4 and patch xdg-v6 to switch (sed or patch) from go-vfs-v3 to go-vfs-v4 c) Package go-vfs non versioned, and modify xdg-v6 spec to replace dependency of go-vfs I would go with option b, so in case any other package depends on it can use the latest version, but as you prefer. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120450 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
