https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120418 Nicola Sella <nsella@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Nicola Sella <nsella@xxxxxxxxxx> --- > Why do you say that lookup time is a problem? Since /usr/bin /usr/sbin /etc file paths are in the same metadata file as package names they should have exactly the same lookup time. I am taking a step back. Initially, my thought process implied that to resolve BuildRequires /some/path, dnf would take an additional step to find the package that provides and installs desktop/appdata files validators. You are right, I completely overthought the problem. Now it's clear on my side. Thank you again for the patience and excuse the convolution in the comments. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120418 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
