https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127314 --- Comment #2 from Kalev Lember <klember@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Thanks a lot for the quick review! I agree with all your comments above. We have to keep the "funky" things if we want to integrate with 3rd party browsers. > gnome-browser-connector.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided chrome-gnome-shell > > ^ well, I'd say it's fine since we're splitting the original chrome-gnome-shell > package: we don't actually provide a full equivalent? Yes, that, and also because there is nothing in Fedora that has 'Requires: chrome-gnome-shell' -- if we had other packages requiring it, we'd need the provides to avoid breaking dependencies in other packages. But maybe it would make sense to add the provides to help people find the renamed package? Not sure :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127314 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
