https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073765 --- Comment #4 from Robin Lee <robinlee.sysu@xxxxxxxxx> --- Spec URL: https://cheeselee.fedorapeople.org/arch-test.spec SRPM URL: https://cheeselee.fedorapeople.org/arch-test-0.18-1.fc36.src.rpm Changes: 1. use %generate_buildrequires to generate the list of binutils BR 2. Don't run configure to not opt out any arch 3. Include the mingw arches and apply an upstream patch to fix the build 4. Convert to rpmautospec (In reply to Jakub Kadlčík from comment #3) > > BuildRequires: binutils-riscv64-linux-gnu > > BuildRequires: binutils-aarch64-linux-gnu > > BuildRequires: binutils-alpha-linux-gnu > > BuildRequires: binutils-arc-linux-gnu > > ... > > Are these really needed? I removed all the binutils-* BuildRequires > and the package still successfully builds in Copr for all Fedora > chroots and architectures. I use %generate_buildrequires to generate the list of binutils variants > > > > %{_bindir}/* > > %{_prefix}/lib/* > > %{_mandir}/man1/* > > Please be more specific here, for example > > %{_bindir}/%{name} > %{_bindir}/elf-arch > ... done > > > > arch-test.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/lib/arch-test/alpha > > arch-test.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/lib/arch-test/amd64 > > arch-test.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/lib/arch-test/arm64 > > Fedora-review tool returns these in the Rpmlint section but if I > understand correctly, this is done intentionally. Yes. That's the trick of this package. It simple build different kinds of executables and run each to see whether the current environment can run codes of that arch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2073765 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
