https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123954 --- Comment #10 from Sandro <gui1ty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #8) > fedora-review output says > > Diff spec file in url and in SRPM > --------------------------------- > --- /home/test/2123954-python-PyMunin3/srpm/python-PyMunin3.spec 2022-09-08 > 15:58:56.025887208 +0530 > +++ /home/test/2123954-python-PyMunin3/srpm-unpacked/python-PyMunin3.spec > 2022-09-05 21:03:54.000000000 +0530 > @@ -1,2 +1,11 @@ > +## START: Set by rpmautospec > +## (rpmautospec version 0.3.0) > +%define autorelease(e:s:pb:n) %{?-p:0.}%{lua: > + release_number = 2; > + base_release_number = tonumber(rpm.expand("%{?-b*}%{!?-b:1}")); > + print(release_number + base_release_number - 1); > +}%{?-e:.%{-e*}}%{?-s:.%{-s*}}%{!?-n:%{?dist}} > +## END: Set by rpmautospec > + This is what rpmautospec puts in the file once it is processed by Copr/Koji. > %bcond_with tests > @@ -11,5 +20,5 @@ > Version: 3.0.1 > Release: %{autorelease} > -Summary: Python module for developing Munin Multigraph Plugins > +Summary: Python module for developing Munin Multigraph Plugins. I removed the trailing dot after I had it rebuild. I can put it back in. But I think it should be dropped just like in the description. > License: GPL-3.0-only > @@ -59,3 +68,12 @@ > > %changelog > -%autochangelog > +* Mon Sep 05 2022 Sandro <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 3.0.1-2 > +- Uncommitted changes > + > +* Mon Sep 05 2022 Sandro <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 3.0.1-1 > +- Fix rpmlint warning and add import test > +- Fix summary-ended-with-dot > +- Add %%pyproject_check_import > + > +* Sat Sep 03 2022 Sandro <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Packaging variables read or > set by %forgemeta-1 > +- Initial package Again, this is the processing of the %autochangelog tag. Looks a bit messy, I agree. But the first official release (-1) will only have the "Inital package" entry. Or I could change that to "Initial release" as is commonly done. The entries are taken from the git commit messages. > Please provide updated SRPM as well. SPEC file and same SPEC file in SRPM. If that is really required, I will trigger another build this evening. (In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #9) > Do you have anymore packages submitted for review? or done any other > unofficial full package review? No, I don't have any other packages submitted currently. For other activities see my opening comment (#c0). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123954 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
