Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: emesene Alias: emesene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238379 ------- Additional Comments From cchance@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-12-16 05:06 EST ------- The description of .spec I provided is cloned from emesene official page http://emesene.org . It has integrated ideas of the comments above: For comment #1, there is '(tm)' mark after the "Windows Live Messenger" name. It should be fine for potential trademark issues. For comment #5, "emesene is a platform independent instant messaging client for the Windows Live Messenger (tm) network." <<< It is written in similar way to the latter. For comment #7, used the latest URL: http://emesene.org . For comment #8, used the second latest tarball r806 . The reason is the latest revision r999 has no executable script of Setup.py (I will update to the latest tarball after I perform some testing on it.) For comment #9, testing had been done on my machine: Rpmlint is quiet rpmbuild -ba emesene.spec is fine, build is done Installs and runs OK in "F8" For comment #11, tested %doc which is okay. For comment #12, the source tarball used is not a snapshot but a revision (r806) which is irrelevant to SVN checkout. ===== Besides the .spec I provided is based on the latest state of emesene, I have made a gnome start menu entry and patched the executable for convenience to users. Please kindly review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review