[Bug 2091310] Review Request: ufo2ft - enable building fonts from source ufo format

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091310

Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+



--- Comment #9 from Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
Rather than filling out the review template again, I note the following:

- The spec file diff, below, includes all of the changes suggested in the
original review and no other changes that could introduce new issues.

--- ../../2091310-python-ufo2ft/srpm-unpacked/python-ufo2ft.spec       
2022-08-28 19:46:25.000000000 -0400
> +++ srpm-unpacked/python-ufo2ft.spec    2022-08-30 12:50:53.000000000 -0400
> @@ -5,10 +5,12 @@
>  %forgemeta
>  
>  Name:           python-%{srcname}
> -Release:        1%{?dist}
> +Release:        2%{?dist}
>  Summary:        A bridge from UFOs to FontTool objects
>  
> -License:        MIT
> +# The entire source is (SPDX) MIT, except:
> +#   - Lib/ufo2ft/filters/propagateAnchors.py is Apache-2.0
> +License:        MIT and Apache-2.0
>  URL:            %forgeurl
>  Source0:        %{pypi_source %{srcname}}
>  
> @@ -48,9 +50,6 @@
>  %prep
>  %forgeautosetup -N
>  %patch01 -p1 
> -#pushd Lib
> -#rm -rf *.egg-info
> -#popd
>  
>  %generate_buildrequires
>  %pyproject_buildrequires
> @@ -73,10 +72,12 @@
>  
>  
>  %files -n python3-%{srcname} -f %{pyproject_files}
> -%license LICENSE
>  %doc README.rst
>   
>  %changelog
> +* Tue Aug 30 2022 Benson Muite <benson_muite@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 2.28.0-2
> +- Update license information as indicated in review
> +
>  * Sun Aug 28 2022 Benson Muite <benson_muite@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 2.28.0-1
>  - Update version
>  - Add patch to relax dependency requirements

- The only rpmlint messages on the new package are spurious; rpmlint does not
yet understand SPDX license identifiers and expressions.

> =============================================== rpmlint session starts ===============================================
> rpmlint: 2.2.0
> configuration:
>     /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
>     /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
>     /etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml
>     /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
>     /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
>     /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
> checks: 32, packages: 2
> 
> python-ufo2ft.src: W: invalid-license Apache-2.0
> python3-ufo2ft.noarch: W: invalid-license Apache-2.0
> ================ 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.6 s ================

The package is therefore APPROVED.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091310
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux