https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076836 --- Comment #6 from Gustavo Costa <xfgusta@xxxxxxxxx> --- Hi Jakub. > Are you sure that this is true even for the .m4 files? I have no idea > what they are, so in the end, it will be your call, I will not > object. All these m4/*.m4 files are Autoconf scripts. They are used to check whether a library is installed and to define some macros. According to [1]: > [...] there may be licenses covering files in the package source code that should not be reflected in the License: field because those files do not end up being compiled or otherwise included in the binary package. Common examples of this are Autoconf scripts and non-bundled test I think we should just keep "GPL-3.0-or-later AND BSD-2-Clause" in the License: field. 1. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-field/#_basic_policy -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076836 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
