https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021040 --- Comment #12 from Troy Dawson <tdawson@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Note: I used prebuild packages using the patch above. But I feel the f36 pre-build binaries with the original unpatched spec would have had the same result. I am approving this Package Review. Just know that you will need to add the above patch, or something similar to get it to build on F37 and Rawhide. ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. Note: Using prebuilt packages [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "*No copyright* Creative Commons CC0 1.0", "Unknown or generated", "GNU General Public License, Version 2", "GNU General Public License, Version 3", "*No copyright* GNU General Public License, Version 3", "*No copyright* GNU General Public License, Version 2", "*No copyright* BSD 2-Clause License", "*No copyright* GNU Library General Public License, Version 2.0". 47 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/quake/review/spacebar/review-spacebar/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: The spec file handles locales properly. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop-file-validate if there is such a file. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Cannot parse rpmlint output: Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Cannot parse rpmlint output: Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.2.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 3 spacebar-debuginfo.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/debug/.dwz/spacebar-22.06-1.fc37.x86_64 spacebar-debuginfo.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/spacebar-22.06-1.fc37.x86_64.debug spacebar-debuginfo.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/debug/usr/libexec/spacebar-daemon-22.06-1.fc37.x86_64.debug spacebar-debuginfo.x86_64: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/lib/debug/.dwz/spacebar-22.06-1.fc37.x86_64 spacebar.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/autostart/org.kde.spacebar.daemon.desktop spacebar.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary spacebar spacebar-debuginfo.x86_64: W: no-documentation spacebar-debugsource.x86_64: W: no-documentation spacebar-debuginfo.x86_64: E: missing-PT_GNU_STACK-section /usr/lib/debug/.dwz/spacebar-22.06-1.fc37.x86_64 spacebar-debuginfo.x86_64: E: ldd-failed /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/spacebar-22.06-1.fc37.x86_64.debug /usr/bin/bash: warning: setlocale: LC_ALL: cannot change locale (en_US.UTF-8) ldd: warning: you do not have execution permission for `/usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/spacebar-22.06-1.fc37.x86_64.debug' spacebar-debuginfo.x86_64: E: ldd-failed /usr/lib/debug/usr/libexec/spacebar-daemon-22.06-1.fc37.x86_64.debug /usr/bin/bash: warning: setlocale: LC_ALL: cannot change locale (en_US.UTF-8) ldd: warning: you do not have execution permission for `/usr/lib/debug/usr/libexec/spacebar-daemon-22.06-1.fc37.x86_64.debug' spacebar-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/debug/.dwz spacebar-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/debug/.dwz spacebar-debugsource.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/src/debug/spacebar-22.06-1.fc37.x86_64/redhat-linux-build/src/settingsmanager.cpp /usr/src/debug/spacebar-22.06-1.fc37.x86_64/redhat-linux-build/daemon/settingsmanager.cpp spacebar-debugsource.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/src/debug/spacebar-22.06-1.fc37.x86_64/redhat-linux-build/src/settingsmanager.h /usr/src/debug/spacebar-22.06-1.fc37.x86_64/redhat-linux-build/daemon/settingsmanager.h:/usr/src/debug/spacebar-22.06-1.fc37.x86_64/redhat-linux-build/lib/mms/settingsmanager.h spacebar-debugsource.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/src/debug/spacebar-22.06-1.fc37.x86_64/redhat-linux-build/src/settingsmanager.moc /usr/src/debug/spacebar-22.06-1.fc37.x86_64/redhat-linux-build/daemon/settingsmanager.moc spacebar.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long Spacebar is a telepathy-qt based SMS application that primarily targets Plasma Mobile. spacebar-debuginfo.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/4f/42ce76e4a30db672569bd7bf2892e14ba24999 ../../../.build-id/4f/42ce76e4a30db672569bd7bf2892e14ba24999 spacebar-debuginfo.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/76/59864380280e4f306030caa5216baa27dc2f21 ../../../.build-id/76/59864380280e4f306030caa5216baa27dc2f21 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 14 warnings, 5 badness; has taken 4.3 s Source checksums ---------------- https://download.kde.org/stable/plasma-mobile/22.06/spacebar-22.06.tar.xz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 794eb2770dff947f8b585e1f9a6d44b26a9a0d62e076ce914fcf35e4e07e894a CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 794eb2770dff947f8b585e1f9a6d44b26a9a0d62e076ce914fcf35e4e07e894a Requires -------- spacebar (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): hicolor-icon-theme kf5-kirigami2 libKF5ConfigCore.so.5()(64bit) libKF5ConfigGui.so.5()(64bit) libKF5Contacts.so.5()(64bit) libKF5CoreAddons.so.5()(64bit) libKF5DBusAddons.so.5()(64bit) libKF5I18n.so.5()(64bit) libKF5KIOGui.so.5()(64bit) libKF5ModemManagerQt.so.6()(64bit) libKF5Notifications.so.5()(64bit) libKF5People.so.5()(64bit) libKF5PeopleBackend.so.5()(64bit) libKF5Service.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Core.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5.15)(64bit) libQt5DBus.so.5()(64bit) libQt5DBus.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) libQt5Gui.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Gui.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) libQt5Network.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Network.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) libQt5Qml.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Qml.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) libQt5Quick.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Quick.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) libQt5QuickControls2.so.5()(64bit) libQt5QuickControls2.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) libQt5Sql.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Sql.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) libQt5Widgets.so.5()(64bit) libQt5Widgets.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libphonenumber.so.8()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.13)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.9)(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) telepathy-mission-control spacebar-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): spacebar-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): Provides -------- spacebar: application() application(org.kde.spacebar.desktop) metainfo() metainfo(org.kde.spacebar.appdata.xml) mimehandler(x-scheme-handler/sms) spacebar spacebar(x86-64) spacebar-debuginfo: debuginfo(build-id) spacebar-debuginfo spacebar-debuginfo(x86-64) spacebar-debugsource: spacebar-debugsource spacebar-debugsource(x86-64) Generated by fedora-review 0.9.0 (6761b6c) last change: 2022-08-23 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -n spacebar -p Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Shell-api, Generic, C/C++ Disabled plugins: Perl, R, Ocaml, Haskell, SugarActivity, Python, fonts, Java, PHP Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021040 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
