https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076836 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Kadlčík <jkadlcik@xxxxxxxxxx> --- > This header file is also part of the "shunting-yard code" and it's > by the same author. Understood > You're right. I fixed it and also updated the license identifiers to use SPDX. +1 for SPDX Though, I am really sorry but I think you had the correct GPL license before I weighed in. I am reading the packaged COPYING file again and now I can see the 'GNU General Public License "or any later version"' line there. I don't know why I missed it before, sorry. So I think it is GPL-3.0-or-later after all. Also, please take a look at the licensecheck.txt here: *No copyright* [generated file] -------------------------------- bitwise-v0.43/bitwise.1 BSD 2-Clause License -------------------- bitwise-v0.43/inc/shunting-yard.h bitwise-v0.43/inc/stack.h bitwise-v0.43/src/shunting-yard.c bitwise-v0.43/src/stack.c bitwise-v0.43/tests/test-shunting-yard.c FSF All Permissive License -------------------------- bitwise-v0.43/m4/ax_lib_readline.m4 FSF Unlimited License (with License Retention) [generated file] --------------------------------------------------------------- bitwise-v0.43/aclocal.m4 FSF Unlimited License [generated file] -------------------------------------- bitwise-v0.43/configure GNU General Public License v2.0 or later [generated file] --------------------------------------------------------- bitwise-v0.43/compile bitwise-v0.43/depcomp bitwise-v0.43/missing bitwise-v0.43/test-driver Unknown or generated -------------------- bitwise-v0.43/COPYING bitwise-v0.43/ChangeLog bitwise-v0.43/Makefile.am bitwise-v0.43/README bitwise-v0.43/configure.ac bitwise-v0.43/inc/bitwise.h bitwise-v0.43/inc/config.h.in bitwise-v0.43/src/cmd.c bitwise-v0.43/src/help.c bitwise-v0.43/src/interactive.c bitwise-v0.43/src/main.c bitwise-v0.43/src/misc.c X11 License [generated file] ---------------------------- bitwise-v0.43/install-sh [generated file] ---------------- bitwise-v0.43/Makefile.in > Both files have the same content. I think it's fine to just install > one of them. Ack, no problem. I would copy both to be extra sure but since they are same, installing just one is reasonable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076836 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
