[Bug 257741] Review Request: g2clib - GRIB2 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines in C

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: g2clib - GRIB2 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines in C


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257741


bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|devel                       |rawhide

orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |381241
              nThis|                            |
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
               Flag|                            |fedora-review-




------- Additional Comments From orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx  2007-12-13 23:55 EST -------
Good:

- rpmlint checks return nothing
- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
- package compiles on devel (x86)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file
- devel package ok
- no .la files

I went ahead and updated to 1.0.5:

http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/g2clib-1.0.5-1.fc8.src.rpm

Question:

  License is listed as Public Domain.  I agree that this is probably the case as
it is US Gov. work, but there seems to be absolutely no mention of this anywhere
in the source.  Not sure if this is necessary for public domain.  CC'ing Spot
for clarification.

  Does upstream has any interest in supporting building shared libraries?

  Otherwise, everything looks good.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]