https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118080 Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Jonathan Wright from comment #3) > Worked with upstream a bit and here's a build with proper shared libs. > > Still not sure on the split package though to cover both GTK and portal. > This version is only GTK. I think it's OK to start with the single GTK variant. For the portal support it would mean building it twice in %build, then installing the portal variant into a "portal" subpackage. One question is whether the variants would be with identical ABI ... Another would what should be the default and how to express it ... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118080 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
