https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116187 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wright <jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- > Comments: > a) The license file indicates modified Apache 2 license. Are the > modifications compatible with Fedora packaging guidelines? Yes. The only change is this: https://github.com/wg/wrk/commit/db6da47fe3ee604d70304c8d10896f8349b972da and since no changes have been made to the source, this is definitely N/A thus no problem for Fedora. > b) In the spec file, should Openssl be listed for licensing requirements? If > so, what about LuaJIT? No. It's using system libs so that's already covered by their respective packages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116187 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
