https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2114603 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wright <jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #8) > > The spec file indeed looks a ton cleaner now. > > Awesome, indeed it does. > > > > A few more tiny nit-picks: > > ----------- > > > BuildRequires: python3-setuptools > > vs. > > > BuildRequires: python3dist(pytest) > > This is not consistent. Let's use python3dist(setuptools) and > python3dist(pytest), or python3-setuptools and python3-pytest? You know, I never would've typed the python3dist version if I did it myself. rpmdev-newspec is the gift that keeps on giving. > ----------- > > > install -m 644 %{SOURCE1} LICENSE > > This is part of %install, but it does not install the LICENSE file to the > package, it merely copies the file to $PWD. Semantically, this belongs to > %prep. I'd probably use `cp -a` instead of `install` myself, but that's just > my personal opinion. Moved to prep using cp. > ----------- > > > %dir %{python3_sitelib}/kgb > > %{python3_sitelib}/kgb/* > > This does not look like a namespace package. I'd use simpler: > > %{python3_sitelib}/kgb/ Indeed it works properly with the trailing / there. It didn't without it. > ----------- > > > %{python3_sitelib}/kgb-%{version}.dist-info* > > Does this work: > > %{python3_sitelib}/kgb-%{version}.dist-info/ > > ? > > It is more explicit. Also easy to spot that it is a directory. Yes indeed. > ----------- > > > Approximatelly half of the pacakge is occupied by > /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/kgb/tests/ -- consider either not > packaging those at all, or moving them to a python3-kgb-tests subpackage. I think I'd rather not package them versus a sub-package though all other python specs I've looked at they just leave them in the main package. I checked a few popular python libs such as python3-pandas, python-urllib3, and python3-numpy A quick `dnf search test` didn't yield any real precedent of sub-packages for tests nor could I find docs on it. Can we just leave them to be in line with other packages? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2114603 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue