https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2113075 Salman <cn137@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cn137@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #2 from Salman <cn137@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- THIS IS AN UNOFFICIAL REVIEW: The following will possibly need to be adressed Issues: ======= - Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Note: Upstream MD5sum check error, diff is in /home/skbutt/review/review- basez/diff.txt See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/SourceURL/ --- /home/skbutt/review/review-basez/upstream-unpacked/Source1/README 2022-08-01 21:32:40.020931501 -0400 +++ /home/skbutt/review/review-basez/srpm-unpacked/README-extract/README 2022-08-01 21:32:40.053931910 -0400 @@ -104,2 +104,3 @@ under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license, or a later version. Since the README already exists, you may need to Patch this as well. Hence the diff error. [!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Note: Bad spec filename: /home/skbutt/review/review-basez/srpm- unpacked/basez.spec See: (this test has no URL) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2113075 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
