https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2099902 --- Comment #9 from Karolina Surma <ksurma@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Except for the doc issue, the package meets the Packaging Guidelines, it installs, it is possible to use (I tested it with Sphinx 5 & python-myst-parser 0.18 on Rawhide), its metadata look correctly, requires and provides are sane. We've discussed license files and the breakdown of licenses in specfile, which was addressed. The material and octicon glyphs issue has been discussed and no better solution rather than include the json files with annotation in the specfile has appeared so far. I'm in favor of approving the package even though it's the duplicate review ticket, so if the both interested packagers agree, let's reopen this ticket, set the appropriate flags and move forward. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2099902 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
