https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2107901 Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Link ID| |Github | |snakemake/snakemake/issues/ | |1776 --- Comment #2 from Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Jeff from comment #1) > I would suggest that the build for fedora be based on the fork and not on > the unmaintained original. retry was last updated ~6 years ago. An interesting suggestion. I notice: - The fork has a new name, so it would be python-reretry. In theory both the original and the fork could be packaged. - Based on PyPI and GitHub statistics and Wheelodex reverse dependencies, the original is still much more popular (probably because it hasn’t yet broken on any of the new Python versions). I think the fork looks promising, although it isn’t entirely clear whether it will collect the momentum of the original user base or whether it will remain maintained after the initial burst of activity in May 2022. I’ve asked snakemake upstream if they would like to switch or not: https://github.com/snakemake/snakemake/issues/1776 Still, I think I’m going to go ahead and submit python-reretry for review, and write the small patch for snakemake to use it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2107901 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
