https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106445 --- Comment #9 from Jaroslav Škarvada <jskarvad@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Alain V. from comment #6) Thanks for the review. > (In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #5) > > Alain are you going to do full review? > Sorry, I was totally AFK those past days. > fedora-review is running ATM, and I am in the packager group. But, I am > afraid to say it will be my first "approval" ! > I still don't feel legitimate at approving a package... > Anyhow, I will review your .spec version 2. > > From what I read so far, I would advise to change "Qucs-s" into "Qucs-S" in > summary and description, as it seems upstream is enforcing this writing. > "qucs-s" is the name of the binary. There should be already Qucs-S. The current summary is: "Qucs circuit simulator which works with SPICE" Which I think it's OK, it says it's Qucs like simulator. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106445 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
