[Bug 2107313] Review Request: folly-rpm-macros - Common RPM macros for the Folly stack

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2107313



--- Comment #10 from Davide Cavalca <dcavalca@xxxxxx> ---
rpmlint is fine:

folly-rpm-macros.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
folly-srpm-macros.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
folly-rpm-macros.noarch: W: no-documentation
folly-srpm-macros.noarch: W: no-documentation

In macros.folly-rpm the referenced bug is closed; also, ppc64le isn't big
endian, so you may wanna adjust the comment. Likewise for macros.folly-srpm we
should reference a BZ or an upstream issue about the GCC 12 ftbfs.

For this one I think it's enough to add a Requires on rpm:

[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d,
     /usr/lib/rpm

or you can own them yourself in %files.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2107313
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux