https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828059 Carl George 🤠 <carl@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |carl@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #5 from Carl George 🤠 <carl@xxxxxxxxxx> --- > I am not sure whether is it possible to create repository without rawhide branch, just epel8 branch. It's not. The way it works is once the package is approved the submitter can request the repo, request the desired epel branches, and then retire the rawhide branch later after the repo exists. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-faq/#is_it_possible_to_get_a_package_only_into_epel_and_not_fedora I would also suggest that this be reworked to be boost1.75 and kept in sync with the RHEL 9 boost package (which is version 1.75). That should make it easier to maintain going forward, especially regarding security backports. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828059 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
