https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2104932 --- Comment #2 from Michael Catanzaro <mcatanza@xxxxxxxxxx> --- OK, I'm happy to review this but it's not quite ready for a full review. First issue I noticed when running fedora-review: WARNING: Cannot download url: http://download.gnome.org/sources/rest1/0.9/rest-0.9.1.tar.xz Can't use %{name} there because it expands to "rest1" but we need it to expand to "rest". Next issue is the mockbuild fails due to missing build dependency. Need to add BuildRequires: pkgconfig(json-glib-1.0) I'll also ask that you convert -devel dependencies into pkgconfig dependencies: BuildRequires: pkgconfig(glib-2.0) BuildRequires: pkgconfig(gobject-introspection-1.0) BuildRequires: pkgconfig(libsoup-3.0) BuildRequires: pkgconfig(libxml-2.0) Finally, in the files list: %{_libdir}/librest-1.0.so.0.0.0 %{_libdir}/librest-extras-1.0.so.0.0.0 I would write: %{_libdir}/librest-1.0.so.0.* %{_libdir}/librest-extras-1.0.so.0.* to avoid needless churn when updating. It's important to keep the first component explicit to avoid unexpected soname bumps, but the rest can be globbed. One more thing: I noticed the upstream package name is inconsistent. I was going to suggest calling this package "librest" instead of "rest1" to match the GitLab project, but the upstream tarball is really called "rest" so I suppose "rest1" is the better name for us to use after all. Nevertheless, I've inquired at https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/librest/-/issues/14 to see what upstream thinks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2104932 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure