[Bug 2103367] Review Request: rust-gag - Redirect, or hold stdout/stderr output

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103367

Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx
                 CC|                            |decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx
              Flags|                            |fedora-review+
           Doc Type|---                         |If docs needed, set a value
             Status|NEW                         |POST



--- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> ---
For explanation:

> 1) The package has documentation, https://docs.rs/gag/latest/src/gag/lib.rs.html#1-131 is it possible to package this?

Short answer: no. As you noted, the documentation built with rustdoc has all
the same problems as other doc generation tools (sphinx, ruby / rdoc, etc.) in
that it bundles fonts, JavaScript, etc. into them, which is typically not
acceptable for a Fedora package.

Additionally, there's a central location for documentation for all published
Rust crates.
In this case, documentation for all (also historical versions of the "gag"
crate would be available at https://docs.rs/gag

> 2) An empty package rust-gag+default-devel-1.0.0-1.fc37.noarch.rpm is created

It's not empty, it contains RPM metadata that is required to make dependency
resolution work correctly for Rust packages.

> 3) File timestamps are 1 January 1970, probably due to how automated packaging from a crate works.

That's probably a problem on the developer's system (i.e. they're using Windows
to publish sources, or something).

===

Actual review:

Package was generated with rust2rpm, simplifying the review.

- package builds and installs without errors on rawhide
- test suite is run and all unit tests pass
- latest version of the crate is packaged
- license matches upstream specification (MIT) and is acceptable for Fedora
- license file is included with %license in %files
- package complies with Rust Packaging Guidelines

Package APPROVED.

===

Recommended post-import rust-sig tasks:

- add @rust-sig with "commit" access as package co-maintainer

- set bugzilla assignee overrides to @rust-sig (optional)

- set up package on release-monitoring.org:
  project: $crate
  homepage: https://crates.io/crates/$crate
  backend: crates.io
  version scheme: semantic
  version filter: alpha;beta;rc;pre
  distro: Fedora
  Package: rust-$crate

- track package in koschei for all built branches

===

Since you offered review swaps, could you review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2089436
in return? This missing package blocks updates of syn, proc-macro2, etc.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103367
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux