https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097612 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Kadlčík <jkadlcik@xxxxxxxxxx> --- > Karolina indicated clearly that in the first comment: Indeed, I overlooked the comment. Thank you for clarifying. > And that clearly is the case both in the initial review, > that I have followed, and now. Agreed :-) I am not particularly sure how we should proceed here, so if anyone has a clear idea, please speak up. However, as I see it, the end result of a package review is a DistGit repository being created. Which already exists https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pyp2spec There is an informal +1 from me and José, and the package is fine. Karolina, I would recommend pushing the package into DistGit, building it in Koji, and submitting a Bodhi update. If everything goes well, I will close this issue as a duplicate of 2025908. If problems occur, we will figure it out. Sounds good? :-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097612 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
