https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035222 --- Comment #16 from Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Lokesh Mandvekar from comment #15) > > /usr/lib64/libwasmedge_c.so > /usr/lib64/wasmedge > /usr/lib64/wasmedge/libwasmedgePluginWasmEdgeProcess.so > > Perhaps we should have versioned shared libraries with the unversioned ones > as symlinks? The former could go into the main package and the latter in the > -devel package. > In other words, I think we don't need the wasmedge-lib package. We can install the files either in wasmedge or wasmedge-devel based on requirement. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035222 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure