https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085444 Pavel Raiskup <praiskup@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |praiskup@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #3 from Pavel Raiskup <praiskup@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Per Fedora guidelines, we can not use /opt in general, you could technically request a FPC exception for /etc/fedora sub-directory: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_limited_usage_of_opt_etcopt_and_varopt The "Open Source" license mentioned in the License tag isn't in: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#Software_License_List I can confirm that the script in %install section is pretty complicated, having a list of wildcards in %files would sound much safer. > Actually SGXSDK is package just for developers. But several files are installed into the default library path /usr/lib64, unversioned. These are typically needed at runtime, or should these be installed elsewhere? Typically, /usr/lib64 is for users (runtime), not developers (build time). /usr/lib64/libsgx_quote_ex_sim.so /usr/lib64/libsgx_launch_sim.so /usr/lib64/libsgx_epid_sim.so /usr/lib64/libsgx_urts_sim.so /usr/lib64/libsgx_uae_service_sim.so -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085444 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
