Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-slide - SELinux Polciy IDE Eclipse Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=299171 ------- Additional Comments From dsugar@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-12-10 09:48 EST ------- Ok, sorry, I missed StringMatcher - that was a recent addition by someone working with me. We have removed that file and did the same functionality a different way. I did not change the formal tarball version because there was no funtional changes, just comments. With this version I have gone back to the SVN versioning because it is again a pre-release and there are functional changes to the 1.3.4 public release. Spec URL (same as before): http://oss.tresys.com/projects/slide/browser/trunk/build/SPEC/eclipse-slide.spec SRPM URL (new): http://oss.tresys.com/projects/slide/chrome/site/srpm/eclipse-slide-1.3.5-0.1.svn2022.src.rpm I think this URL describes answers the question if we have the right to relicense the files that we did. Because we only used the files as a starting point and they were significantly changed from the original it is ok. http://www.eclipse.org/legal/eplfaq.php#EXAMPLE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review