https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2090823 --- Comment #4 from Jeremy Newton <alexjnewt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- > Is RPMLint meant to be run on the debuginfo packages? From what I can tell, the Zuul CI we use doesn't run RPMLint on debuginfo packages. > It also doesn't make sense to warn about unstripped debuginfo files, since that is all the data take from object files when the are stripped. I thought rpmlint was designed to run against all packages, including debuginfo. I've always ran rpmlint against all my build output and never had a complaint before. Perhaps, my interpretation of the fedora-review item "Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces" is incorrect. Although maybe rpmlint doesn't handle something correctly in this case, such as not correctly ignoring the files that should be unstripped. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2090823 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure