https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2090823 --- Comment #2 from Jeremy Newton <alexjnewt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- For reference, ROCm-OpenCL and ROCclr are not mutually exclusive components. They require each others sources to compile. In constrast, HIP just needs the ROCclr binary and headers to compile. It causes a problematic situation where building HIP right now requires bundling openCL (some) and ROCclr (all) sources. I think it leads to two conclusions: - ROCclr should be built and packaged together, so we can provide hip a "rocclr-devel" package (or equivalent) as a buildrequires - ROCclr, hip, and OpenCL should live in the same tree, since there's a lot of overlap in sources If you look through the Debian AI list thread I mentioned above, upstream is leaning towards the latter, so I'm thinking I can introduce hip as a subpackage of rocm-opencl later on if upstream goes this way. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2090823 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
