https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085468 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx> --- * Package named correctly * Packaging the latest version * SPEC file clean and legible, consistent use of whitespace, macros * License tag seems correct * License good for Fedora * Builds in mock * rpmlint reasonably happy * Filelist sane * Requires/provides look good The package is APPROVED I've had trouble figuring out what license did the project developers intend to use. The only clue has been the "Re-licensed to GPLv2." sentence in CHANGES.md. I'm wondering if you could raise a ticket upstream about this? Perhaps they could mention the license in README.md or include a SPDX tag in the source files. Note this is not a review blocker. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085468 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
