Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bib2html - Converting bibTeX file to HTML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417421 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx 2007-12-09 18:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > > I have packaged a similar package, but I don't want to maintain > > yet another package, so if you are interested, here it is: > > My list is growing too, but I will take it (however I don't > have a clue about ocaml ...). There are no debuginfo packages for ocaml bins? I don't know. I am not very knowlegeable in ocaml myself, that is also a reason why I didn't submitted the package. I had a look at the ocaml packaging guidelines, but there is nothing for packages that are not ocaml libraries. > spec: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/bib2html/bibtex2html.spec > srpm: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/bib2html/bibtex2html-1.88-2.fc8.src.rpm > > (Will send separate bz report later) > > BTW: I found some bugs in your nice debian related packages: > http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/debian/ I will try to fix them, please contact me directly. > Has these packages found any maintainer? debootstrap is now packaged. There was some discussion about dpkg on fedora-devel (with some people wanting to cripple the package to avoid having unattended installation of .deb -- something I am opposed to). In any case all the packages that are still there are not submitted, to my knowledge. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review