https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082662 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx Status|NEW |POST Flags| |fedora-review+ CC| |zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx --- Comment #2 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> --- > Version: 3.1 > Release: 0.1%{?commit:.git%{shortcommit}}%{?dist} Version: 3.1.0%{?commit:.git%{shortcommit}}%{?dist} Release: 1 [https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Versioning/#_snapshots] > Summary: Limited Error Raster Compression Maybe "Library for …" ? As usual, I'd suggest %autorelease and %autochangelog. It seems that the algorithm is patented and that the Authors provide a grant via para 4 of the license. This appears to be OK. Our guidelines say: > If a package contains code covered by known patents, then you should seek a written patent grant > (and include that grant inside the package) before submitting it for Fedora. rpmlint: liblerc.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/liblerc/NOTICE liblerc.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/liblerc/README.md liblerc-devel.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/liblerc-devel/MORE.md liblerc-debuginfo.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libLerc.so.3-3.1-0.1.gitb1de4cd.fc37.x86_64.debug liblerc-debuginfo.x86_64: E: shared-library-without-dependency-information /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libLerc.so.3-3.1-0.1.gitb1de4cd.fc37.x86_64.debug mingw32-liblerc.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw64-liblerc.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw32-liblerc.noarch: E: double-slash-in-pkgconfig-path /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/Lerc.pc libdir=${exec_prefix}//usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib mingw64-liblerc.noarch: E: double-slash-in-pkgconfig-path /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/Lerc.pc libdir=${exec_prefix}//usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib mingw32-liblerc.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/Lerc_c_api.h mingw32-liblerc.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/Lerc_types.h mingw32-liblerc.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libLerc.dll.a mingw32-liblerc.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/Lerc.pc mingw64-liblerc.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/Lerc_c_api.h mingw64-liblerc.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/Lerc_types.h mingw64-liblerc.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libLerc.dll.a mingw64-liblerc.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/Lerc.pc liblerc-debuginfo.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/01/a0882a6471b6332eeab6fe8aed3de0cbea741b ../../../.build-id/01/a0882a6471b6332eeab6fe8aed3de0cbea741b mingw32-liblerc.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libLerc.dll.a mingw64-liblerc.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libLerc.dll.a Seems all bogus or unimportant. fedora-review also doesn't find anything interesting. + package name is OK + latest version (snapshot) + license is acceptable for Fedora (ASL 2.0) + license is specified correctly + builds and installs + BR/P/R look OK Package is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082662 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
