https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076374 --- Comment #26 from Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Jered Floyd from comment #23) > > > [!]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. > > > Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in > > > trafficserver-selinux , trafficserver-devel , trafficserver-perl > > > > The selinux subpackage is fine as-is, but the rest need their "%{name} = > > %{version}-%{release}" dependency updated to "%{name}%{?_isa} = > > %{version}-%{release}". > > For trafficserver-perl, would it actually be more correct to add: > > BuildArch: noarch > > rather than adding the architecture to the dependencies? Yes. I also just noticed you should probably be using "%{perl_vendorlib}" instead of "%{_datadir}/perl5" in your file lists. You need to add BuildRequires for perl-generators and perl-interpreter too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076374 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
