https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079784 --- Comment #24 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> --- > Is there a BZ filed about supporting a generic name for second-stage EFI boot manager binaries? I'd like to track that too... AFAIK, no. I think that installing as 'grubx64.efi' is something that we'll have to do anyway, to support existing systems. So this isn't something that was considered high priority. We'd need to check if this was requested before, and if not file a new issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079784 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
