[Bug 2081088] Review Request: ephemeral-port-reserve - Bind to an ephemeral port, force it into the TIME_WAIT state, and unbind it

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081088

Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx



--- Comment #2 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
> Upstream describe this as a tool so it might be packaged without the python- prefix. On the other hand, werkzeug uses it as a library.


I was looking at this as well and I agree with the ambiguity. I think both
naming approaches are valid here. Personally, I would go with the upstream's
preference, but I wouldn't object the opossite.


We should however add `%py_provides python3-ephemeral-port-reserve` if we name
it ephemeral-port-reserve (or alternatively, add `Provides:
ephemeral-port-reserve = %{version}-%{release}` if we name it
python3-ephemeral-port-reserve).


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081088
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux