https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079784 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx | |) | --- Comment #22 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #21) > He's saying it should not be overwriting the shim EFI binary, and I agree, that's Bad(tm). The example I showed is for the unsigned binary that replaces shim. Once the binary has been signed, we'll have to install it under a different path where shim can pick it up. From what we looked at, we might have to call ourselves either 'grubx64.efi' or 'fallbackx64.efi', because that's what shim looks for. If shim gets support for looking for a more generic name later, we could switch to that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079784 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
