https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076374 --- Comment #5 from Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> --- Initial spec review: > # Upstream does not support 32-bit architectures: > # https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/4432 > ExcludeArch: armhfp Please use "%{arm} %{ix86}" here (which expands to all 32-bit arm and x86 arches), "armhfp" isn't a real architecture. (I'd prefer to use "%{arm32}" for 32-bit arm arches, but that only exists in RHEL9+ right now, and nobody backported it to EPEL 8 yet...) > # trafficserver does not work properly with OpenSSL 3.0.2 yet > # Upstream issue: https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/7341 > %if 0%{?fedora} >= 36 || 0%{?rhel} >= 9 > BuildRequires: openssl1.1-devel > %else > BuildRequires: openssl-devel > %endif [...] > %if 0%{?fedora} >= 36 || 0%{?rhel} >= 9 > Requires: openssl1.1 > %else > Requires: openssl > # Require an OpenSSL which supports PROFILE=SYSTEM > Conflicts: openssl-libs < 1:1.0.1h-4 > %endif openssl1.1-devel does not exist in RHEL/EPEL 9, so you cannot build for RHEL 9. The situation around openssl1.1 is weird. There's compat-openssl11 in RHEL 9, but it doesn't provide devel content, and it's unusually crippled (no FIPS support, for example). I'm not sure what we should do in EPEL about it. > --enable-layout=Gentoo \ Umm, what? > %ghost %verify(not md5 size mode mtime) %{_sharedstatedir}/selinux/%{selinuxtype}/active/modules/200/%{modulename} The %verify stanza is redundant for a %ghost file (which already doesn't do any verification) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076374 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
