https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079784 --- Comment #17 from Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #15) > > What about 'Provides:systemd-boot-signed(%{efi_arch)) = %version-%release' ? > > Added: > +Provides: systemd-boot-signed-%{efi_arch} = %version-%release > and in the systemd pr: > +Provides: systemd-boot-unsigned-%{efi_arch} = %version-%release > > I guess that using -%{efi_arch} has the advantage that (%{efi_arch}) could > be mistaken > and/or interfere with (%{_isa}). > Yes, thanks for doing that! :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079784 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
