[Bug 2079784] Review Request: systemd-boot - UEFI boot manager

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079784



--- Comment #5 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #4)
> (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #2)
> > Questions/notes:
> > 
> >  1) should this buildrequire the exact same version of %{source_rpm_name}?
> 
> I wanted to avoid that because it'd mean that we'd need to manually copy the
> version.
> The motivation for splitting this package out is that it'll be built
> (presumably much) less
> often than the systemd package. So the release numbers will get out of sync.
> And in fact systemd-boot does not need to match the systemd version: we
> generally want
> to update it whenever there's a new version, but it could be before or after
> the systemd
> package. (systemd-boot generally must support booting newer and older
> systems in multiboot
> scenarios, and non-linux systems, etc.)


It will be quite confusing when this package version will be 251~rc1 but the
stuff it signed will be 252~rc3. That's why. Release numbers can get out of
sync, I was talking about the version.

E.g.:

  BuildRequires:  %{source_rpm_name} = %{version}


-----------



Related suggestion -- what if you added:

  Provides: bundled(%{source_rpm_name}) = %(rpm -q --qf
'%%{VERSION}-%%{RELEASE}')

That way, the version-release will be repoqueriable. The current way, the
version is only in description, which is harder to get.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079784
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux