[Bug 2030595] Review Request: sgx-aesm-service - SGX Architectural Enclave Service Manager

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030595



--- Comment #30 from Yunying Sun <yunying.sun@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #29)
> Please split things into the final packages where they are supposed to be.
> Splitting
> or packages is complicated. It's much less work to have the desired layout
> of packages
> from the beginning.
So it means sgx sdk has to be packaged first, then we use it as a dependent
package for SDK and DCAP packaging. Is that right?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030595
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux