[Bug 2030595] Review Request: sgx-aesm-service - SGX Architectural Enclave Service Manager

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030595



--- Comment #27 from Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
> Re the signed binaries: can you please describe how this is supposed to work in general?
> Is the stuff being signed built as part of the rpm build?

The signing tool is included, but no signing is done as part of the rpm build.

One way to arrange this could be for the spec file to have two modes, one that
uses the prebuilt files and one that builds the enclaves without signature.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030595
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux