https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071646 --- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> --- Ah, the link is https://en.cppreference.com/w/Cppreference:FAQ#What_can_I_do_with_the_material_on_this_site.3F Please add that in a comment in the spec file. So this looks all good, but the license should *not* include MIT [https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_field]: > The License: field refers to the licenses of the contents of the binary rpm. I'd suggest %autorelease+%autochangelog to reduce the maintenance burden: https://docs.pagure.org/fedora-infra.rpmautospec/opting-in.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2071646 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
